Today’s post topic is going to be about Battlefield Vs. Call Of Duty. I will be splitting up the "Vs" articles in to 4 categories. Campaign, Online, Graphics, and "Realism". Lets get started. (I am going to say IMP for in my opinion) (W means won)
Campaign
Call Of Duty: IMP the campaign on COD is not very fun. I have always thought it was kind of slow. It is not very realistic and a lot of the concepts are based on future technology and weapons.
(W) Battlefield: IMP all of the battlefield cam
pe very fun. You are always on the edged of seat looking behind you for an enemy. It is very realistic with the modern day setting vs. COD which is set farther in the future sort of like Halo. My favorite battlefield campaign is battlefield 3.
pe very fun. You are always on the edged of seat looking behind you for an enemy. It is very realistic with the modern day setting vs. COD which is set farther in the future sort of like Halo. My favorite battlefield campaign is battlefield 3.
Online Multiplayer
COD: IMP the online multiplayer on Call Of Duty is very fun. It is action packed and is fun to customize your classes and weapons. The only downside IMP is that the maps are very small which makes it hard to snipe and have clan
sare so "Cramped". (W) BF: IMP multiplayer on BF is so much fun. I could play this for hours on end. The maps are huge and if you have a clan you can really dominate. Graphics (W) COD: IMP the graphics on COD are spectacular. It is so realistic and the blood looks amazing. I like it because when your are shot it doesn’t fog up your screen with blood like much of the other first person shooters. IMP the graphics are much better on COD than BF. Battlefield: IMP the graphics on BF are good. They could be much better on things like Vehicles and guns.
sare so "Cramped". (W) BF: IMP multiplayer on BF is so much fun. I could play this for hours on end. The maps are huge and if you have a clan you can really dominate. Graphics (W) COD: IMP the graphics on COD are spectacular. It is so realistic and the blood looks amazing. I like it because when your are shot it doesn’t fog up your screen with blood like much of the other first person shooters. IMP the graphics are much better on COD than BF. Battlefield: IMP the graphics on BF are good. They could be much better on things like Vehicles and guns.
Realism
COD: Call Of Duty is not very realistic. Are they really going to deploy a drone when there being shot at with tanks? I don’t think so. BF defiantly wins on Realism.
(W) BF: Very realistic and could happen in modern day.
Who won?
IMP Battlefield won by far. It is a lot more realistic and the maps are a lot bigger than COD. Even though the graphics might not beat COD, the gameplay was better which matters the most IMP.
Next Post Topic: To be announced.
No comments:
Post a Comment